WhatsApp

Trafalgar Bridge Case Study Help Checklist

Trafalgar Bridge Case Study Help Checklist

Trafalgar Bridge Case Study Solution
Trafalgar Bridge Case Study Help
Trafalgar Bridge Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Trafalgar Bridge decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following area focuses on the of marketing for Trafalgar Bridge where the company's clients, competitors and core competencies have assessed in order to justify whether the choice to release Case Study Help under Trafalgar Bridge trademark name would be a feasible option or not. We have actually first of all looked at the kind of consumers that Trafalgar Bridge handle while an assessment of the competitive environment and the business's weaknesses and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the validation for not releasing Case Study Help under Trafalgar Bridge name.
Trafalgar Bridge Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups use Trafalgar Bridge high performance adhesives while the business is not only involved in the production of these adhesives however also markets them to these customer groups. We would be focusing on the customers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis given that the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Trafalgar Bridge compared to that of instant adhesives.

The total market for immediate adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both client groups which have been recognized earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Trafalgar Bridge possible market or consumer groups, we can see that the company offers to OEMs (Original Devices Producers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair and overhauling companies (MRO) and producers handling items made from leather, wood, plastic and metal. This variety in consumers recommends that Trafalgar Bridge can target has different choices in terms of segmenting the marketplace for its new item especially as each of these groups would be requiring the same type of product with respective modifications in demand, amount or product packaging. Nevertheless, the client is not rate delicate or brand name mindful so launching a low priced dispenser under Trafalgar Bridge name is not an advised choice.

Company Analysis

Trafalgar Bridge is not simply a manufacturer of adhesives however enjoys market management in the instantaneous adhesive market. The business has its own competent and competent sales force which adds value to sales by training the company's network of 250 distributors for helping with the sale of adhesives. Trafalgar Bridge believes in unique distribution as suggested by the reality that it has actually chosen to sell through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be checked out for expanding reach by means of distributors. The business's reach is not limited to The United States and Canada only as it likewise takes pleasure in worldwide sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all throughout North America, Trafalgar Bridge has its internal production plants instead of utilizing out-sourcing as the favored method.

Core proficiencies are not restricted to adhesive production just as Trafalgar Bridge also focuses on making adhesive dispensing equipment to help with the use of its items. This dual production strategy provides Trafalgar Bridge an edge over competitors since none of the competitors of giving equipment makes immediate adhesives. Furthermore, none of these rivals sells directly to the customer either and makes use of suppliers for connecting to clients. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Trafalgar Bridge, it is necessary to highlight the company's weaknesses too.

Although the business's sales staff is proficient in training suppliers, the truth remains that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying greatly on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. However, it needs to likewise be noted that the suppliers are revealing hesitation when it pertains to offering equipment that requires servicing which increases the obstacles of offering devices under a specific brand.

The business has items aimed at the high end of the market if we look at Trafalgar Bridge item line in adhesive equipment especially. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Trafalgar Bridge offers Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio. Offered the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Trafalgar Bridge high-end product line, sales cannibalization would certainly be impacting Trafalgar Bridge sales earnings if the adhesive equipment is offered under the business's brand.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Trafalgar Bridge 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible risk which could decrease Trafalgar Bridge income if Case Study Help is introduced under the business's brand. The truth that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a great time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Additionally, if we take a look at the market in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or price consciousness which provides us 2 additional reasons for not introducing a low priced product under the company's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Trafalgar Bridge would be studied via Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development potential due to the existence of fragmented sections with Trafalgar Bridge delighting in management and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry players, Eastman and Permabond. While market rivalry in between these players could be called 'intense' as the consumer is not brand name mindful and each of these gamers has prominence in regards to market share, the reality still remains that the market is not saturated and still has several market sectors which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when introducing an adhesive. However, we can even mention the reality that sales cannibalization might be leading to market rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the marketplace for instant adhesives uses development capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this industry is low especially as the buyer has low knowledge about the product. While business like Trafalgar Bridge have actually handled to train suppliers relating to adhesives, the last consumer is dependent on suppliers. Around 72% of sales are made directly by makers and suppliers for instantaneous adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the fact that the adhesive market is controlled by 3 players, it could be said that the supplier enjoys a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. The truth stays that the provider does not have much impact over the buyer at this point particularly as the purchaser does not show brand name acknowledgment or rate sensitivity. This shows that the distributor has the greater power when it pertains to the adhesive market while the buyer and the manufacturer do not have a significant control over the actual sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese competitors in the instantaneous adhesive market shows that the market permits ease of entry. However, if we take a look at Trafalgar Bridge in particular, the business has double abilities in regards to being a producer of instantaneous adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Prospective risks in equipment giving market are low which shows the possibility of developing brand awareness in not only instant adhesives however also in giving adhesives as none of the industry players has handled to position itself in dual capabilities.

Hazard of Substitutes: The threat of replacements in the instant adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic idea applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The fact remains that if Trafalgar Bridge presented Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Trafalgar Bridge Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually given various reasons for not releasing Case Study Help under Trafalgar Bridge name, we have actually a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help given listed below if Trafalgar Bridge chooses to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market chosen for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of reasons. There are presently 89257 establishments in this sector and a high usage of approximately 58900 pounds. is being utilized by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional development potential of 10.1% which may be a good enough specific niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this particular market, the reality that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being sold for use with SuperBonder. The item would be sold without the 'glumetic tip' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can decide whether he wants to opt for either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The recommended cost of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through distributors or via direct selling. A price listed below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor automobile maintenance store needs to buy the item on his own.

Trafalgar Bridge would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Trafalgar Bridge for releasing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Trafalgar Bridge straight sends out the item to the regional distributor and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Trafalgar Bridge. Considering that the sales team is currently participated in offering instant adhesives and they do not have know-how in selling dispensers, involving them in the selling procedure would be pricey specifically as each sales call expenses approximately $120. The distributors are currently selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial option.

Promotion: Although a low promotional budget plan should have been appointed to Case Study Help however the reality that the dispenser is an innovation and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the suggested marketing strategy costing $51816 is suggested for initially presenting the item in the market. The prepared advertisements in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in car maintenance stores. (Recommended text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Trafalgar Bridge Case Study Analysis

A recommended plan of action in the kind of a marketing mix has actually been talked about for Case Study Help, the reality still stays that the product would not complement Trafalgar Bridge item line. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross profitability for the two designs is expected to be around $49377 if 250 systems of each model are produced each year according to the strategy. Nevertheless, the preliminary prepared advertising is around $52000 each year which would be putting a strain on the company's resources leaving Trafalgar Bridge with a negative net income if the costs are assigned to Case Study Help just.

The reality that Trafalgar Bridge has actually currently incurred a preliminary financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and prototype development suggests that the profits from Case Study Help is inadequate to undertake the risk of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low flexibility of demand is not a preferable choice particularly of it is impacting the sale of the company's profits producing designs.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE