WhatsApp

Accounts Receivable Valuation Case Study Help Checklist

Accounts Receivable Valuation Case Study Help Checklist

Accounts Receivable Valuation Case Study Solution
Accounts Receivable Valuation Case Study Help
Accounts Receivable Valuation Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Accounts Receivable Valuation decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Accounts Receivable Valuation where the business's clients, rivals and core proficiencies have actually assessed in order to justify whether the choice to introduce Case Study Help under Accounts Receivable Valuation brand name would be a possible choice or not. We have actually firstly looked at the type of customers that Accounts Receivable Valuation handle while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the company's strengths and weaknesses follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not introducing Case Study Help under Accounts Receivable Valuation name.
Accounts Receivable Valuation Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups utilize Accounts Receivable Valuation high efficiency adhesives while the company is not just involved in the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these consumer groups. We would be focusing on the consumers of immediate adhesives for this analysis given that the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Accounts Receivable Valuation compared to that of instant adhesives.

The total market for instant adhesives is around 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have been recognized earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Accounts Receivable Valuation prospective market or consumer groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Initial Devices Producers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair and upgrading companies (MRO) and makers dealing in products made from leather, metal, wood and plastic. This variety in clients suggests that Accounts Receivable Valuation can target has different options in terms of segmenting the market for its brand-new product specifically as each of these groups would be needing the very same kind of product with respective changes in packaging, quantity or demand. However, the client is not cost sensitive or brand name mindful so releasing a low priced dispenser under Accounts Receivable Valuation name is not a recommended alternative.

Company Analysis

Accounts Receivable Valuation is not simply a maker of adhesives but enjoys market leadership in the instant adhesive industry. The business has its own competent and certified sales force which adds value to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for helping with the sale of adhesives.

Core competences are not restricted to adhesive production just as Accounts Receivable Valuation also concentrates on making adhesive dispensing devices to assist in using its products. This dual production technique offers Accounts Receivable Valuation an edge over competitors given that none of the competitors of dispensing devices makes instantaneous adhesives. In addition, none of these competitors offers straight to the customer either and uses suppliers for connecting to clients. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Accounts Receivable Valuation, it is necessary to highlight the business's weak points also.

The business's sales staff is experienced in training distributors, the fact stays that the sales team is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. It ought to also be kept in mind that the distributors are showing hesitation when it comes to selling equipment that needs maintenance which increases the obstacles of selling equipment under a particular brand name.

The business has products intended at the high end of the market if we look at Accounts Receivable Valuation product line in adhesive equipment especially. If Accounts Receivable Valuation sells Case Study Help under the very same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Provided the fact that Case Study Help is priced lower than Accounts Receivable Valuation high-end product line, sales cannibalization would absolutely be impacting Accounts Receivable Valuation sales revenue if the adhesive devices is sold under the business's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Accounts Receivable Valuation 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is launched under the company's brand name, there is another possible risk which could lower Accounts Receivable Valuation income. The fact that $175000 has been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a great time for introducing a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instant adhesive.

In addition, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or price consciousness which provides us two extra reasons for not releasing a low priced product under the company's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Accounts Receivable Valuation would be studied through Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth potential due to the presence of fragmented segments with Accounts Receivable Valuation enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with two other market players, Eastman and Permabond. While industry rivalry in between these gamers could be called 'intense' as the consumer is not brand mindful and each of these players has prominence in regards to market share, the reality still stays that the industry is not filled and still has several market segments which can be targeted as potential niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. Nevertheless, we can even explain the reality that sales cannibalization might be resulting in industry rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for immediate adhesives provides growth capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low especially as the purchaser has low understanding about the item. While companies like Accounts Receivable Valuation have managed to train distributors concerning adhesives, the last customer depends on distributors. Around 72% of sales are made directly by producers and suppliers for immediate adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the truth that the adhesive market is controlled by 3 players, it could be stated that the supplier enjoys a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. The fact remains that the supplier does not have much influence over the purchaser at this point particularly as the buyer does not reveal brand name recognition or price sensitivity. This indicates that the supplier has the greater power when it comes to the adhesive market while the purchaser and the producer do not have a significant control over the real sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name commitment and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese competitors in the instant adhesive market suggests that the market allows ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we take a look at Accounts Receivable Valuation in particular, the business has double capabilities in terms of being a maker of adhesive dispensers and instantaneous adhesives. Prospective hazards in equipment dispensing market are low which reveals the possibility of creating brand awareness in not just immediate adhesives however also in giving adhesives as none of the industry gamers has actually managed to position itself in double capabilities.

Threat of Substitutes: The risk of alternatives in the immediate adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic tip applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The reality remains that if Accounts Receivable Valuation presented Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Accounts Receivable Valuation Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has provided numerous factors for not launching Case Study Help under Accounts Receivable Valuation name, we have a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help provided below if Accounts Receivable Valuation decides to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market chosen for Case Study Help is 'Motor lorry services' for a number of factors. This market has an extra growth capacity of 10.1% which may be an excellent enough specific niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser deal convenience to this specific market, the truth that the Diy market can likewise be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder.

Price: The suggested cost of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through suppliers or by means of direct selling. This cost would not include the expense of the 'vari tip' or the 'glumetic tip'. A price below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance store needs to purchase the item on his own. This would increase the possibility of affecting mechanics to purchase the product for use in their daily maintenance jobs.

Accounts Receivable Valuation would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross success and net profitability for Accounts Receivable Valuation for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Accounts Receivable Valuation directly sends the item to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be utilized by Accounts Receivable Valuation. Considering that the sales team is currently participated in selling instantaneous adhesives and they do not have competence in selling dispensers, including them in the selling process would be costly specifically as each sales call expenses approximately $120. The distributors are currently selling dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a favorable alternative.

Promotion: Although a low advertising budget needs to have been assigned to Case Study Help but the truth that the dispenser is an innovation and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses sustained for production, the recommended marketing strategy costing $51816 is recommended for at first presenting the item in the market. The prepared advertisements in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in lorry maintenance stores. (Recommended text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Accounts Receivable Valuation Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested strategy in the form of a marketing mix has been discussed for Case Study Help, the truth still stays that the product would not match Accounts Receivable Valuation product line. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross success for the two designs is expected to be approximately $49377 if 250 units of each model are manufactured annually as per the plan. The initial planned advertising is roughly $52000 per year which would be putting a pressure on the business's resources leaving Accounts Receivable Valuation with a negative net earnings if the expenses are allocated to Case Study Help just.

The truth that Accounts Receivable Valuation has already incurred an initial financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and prototype development shows that the earnings from Case Study Help is insufficient to carry out the risk of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low elasticity of demand is not a more effective alternative particularly of it is impacting the sale of the company's earnings producing designs.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE