Chestnut Foods Case Study Help Checklist

Chestnut Foods Case Study Help Checklist

Chestnut Foods Case Study Solution
Chestnut Foods Case Study Help
Chestnut Foods Case Study Analysis

Analyses for Evaluating Chestnut Foods decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following area focuses on the of marketing for Chestnut Foods where the company's consumers, rivals and core competencies have actually assessed in order to validate whether the decision to introduce Case Study Help under Chestnut Foods brand name would be a feasible option or not. We have actually first of all looked at the type of consumers that Chestnut Foods handle while an assessment of the competitive environment and the business's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not introducing Case Study Help under Chestnut Foods name.
Chestnut Foods Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Chestnut Foods customers can be segmented into two groups, industrial customers and last customers. Both the groups use Chestnut Foods high performance adhesives while the business is not just involved in the production of these adhesives but likewise markets them to these consumer groups. There are two types of products that are being sold to these potential markets; instantaneous adhesives and anaerobic adhesives. We would be concentrating on the consumers of immediate adhesives for this analysis given that the market for the latter has a lower potential for Chestnut Foods compared to that of instant adhesives.

The overall market for instant adhesives is around 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been identified earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Chestnut Foods prospective market or customer groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Original Devices Producers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair work and upgrading companies (MRO) and manufacturers handling products made from leather, plastic, metal and wood. This diversity in consumers suggests that Chestnut Foods can target has different choices in terms of segmenting the market for its brand-new item particularly as each of these groups would be needing the same kind of product with particular modifications in quantity, product packaging or demand. However, the consumer is not cost sensitive or brand mindful so releasing a low priced dispenser under Chestnut Foods name is not an advised alternative.

Company Analysis

Chestnut Foods is not simply a producer of adhesives however takes pleasure in market leadership in the immediate adhesive market. The company has its own knowledgeable and qualified sales force which includes worth to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for helping with the sale of adhesives.

Core proficiencies are not restricted to adhesive manufacturing just as Chestnut Foods also focuses on making adhesive giving equipment to assist in the use of its items. This double production method provides Chestnut Foods an edge over competitors since none of the competitors of giving devices makes instant adhesives. In addition, none of these rivals offers straight to the consumer either and utilizes distributors for reaching out to consumers. While we are looking at the strengths of Chestnut Foods, it is essential to highlight the business's weaknesses.

The business's sales personnel is experienced in training suppliers, the truth stays that the sales team is not trained in selling equipment so there is a possibility of relying greatly on suppliers when promoting adhesive equipment. It ought to likewise be kept in mind that the suppliers are revealing reluctance when it comes to offering equipment that requires servicing which increases the obstacles of offering devices under a specific brand name.

The company has items aimed at the high end of the market if we look at Chestnut Foods item line in adhesive devices particularly. If Chestnut Foods sells Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Provided the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Chestnut Foods high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would certainly be impacting Chestnut Foods sales profits if the adhesive equipment is sold under the company's brand.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Chestnut Foods 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible risk which might decrease Chestnut Foods revenue if Case Study Help is introduced under the company's brand name. The truth that $175000 has been invested in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

Additionally, if we take a look at the market in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or price awareness which offers us two extra factors for not introducing a low priced item under the business's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Chestnut Foods would be studied through Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth potential due to the presence of fragmented sectors with Chestnut Foods taking pleasure in management and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry players, Eastman and Permabond. While market rivalry in between these players could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand conscious and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the fact still stays that the industry is not saturated and still has numerous market sections which can be targeted as possible niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. We can even point out the reality that sales cannibalization may be leading to industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives provides growth capacity.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this industry is low particularly as the buyer has low understanding about the product. While business like Chestnut Foods have managed to train distributors concerning adhesives, the last customer depends on suppliers. Approximately 72% of sales are made directly by manufacturers and suppliers for instantaneous adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the truth that the adhesive market is controlled by three players, it could be stated that the supplier delights in a greater bargaining power compared to the purchaser. However, the reality remains that the supplier does not have much impact over the buyer at this moment especially as the buyer does disappoint brand recognition or cost sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the producer and the buyer do not have a major control over the actual sales, this indicates that the supplier has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the immediate adhesive market suggests that the marketplace allows ease of entry. If we look at Chestnut Foods in particular, the company has dual abilities in terms of being a maker of adhesive dispensers and instant adhesives. Potential hazards in equipment giving industry are low which reveals the possibility of creating brand name awareness in not just instant adhesives but likewise in dispensing adhesives as none of the market gamers has actually managed to position itself in dual abilities.

Risk of Substitutes: The risk of alternatives in the immediate adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic suggestion applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The truth remains that if Chestnut Foods introduced Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Chestnut Foods Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has given different factors for not introducing Case Study Help under Chestnut Foods name, we have actually a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help offered listed below if Chestnut Foods chooses to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market picked for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of reasons. This market has an extra growth capacity of 10.1% which might be a good enough niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser deal convenience to this specific market, the fact that the Diy market can likewise be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being offered for usage with SuperBonder.

Price: The suggested cost of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through suppliers or through direct selling. This rate would not include the expense of the 'vari tip' or the 'glumetic tip'. A cost below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle upkeep store requires to purchase the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to buy the item for usage in their daily upkeep tasks.

Chestnut Foods would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross profitability and net success for Chestnut Foods for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation design where Chestnut Foods straight sends the product to the local distributor and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the distributor would be used by Chestnut Foods. Because the sales team is currently taken part in selling instant adhesives and they do not have competence in selling dispensers, including them in the selling process would be pricey specifically as each sales call expenses around $120. The suppliers are currently offering dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a favorable alternative.

Promotion: Although a low advertising spending plan ought to have been appointed to Case Study Help but the fact that the dispenser is an innovation and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses sustained for production, the recommended advertising strategy costing $51816 is recommended for initially introducing the product in the market. The prepared ads in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in automobile upkeep shops. (Suggested text for the advertisement is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Chestnut Foods Case Study Analysis

Although a recommended plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has been talked about for Case Study Help, the fact still remains that the product would not match Chestnut Foods line of product. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross profitability for the two designs is expected to be approximately $49377 if 250 systems of each model are manufactured each year based on the strategy. However, the initial planned marketing is approximately $52000 each year which would be putting a strain on the company's resources leaving Chestnut Foods with a negative earnings if the expenditures are assigned to Case Study Help only.

The fact that Chestnut Foods has currently incurred an initial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and prototype development indicates that the revenue from Case Study Help is inadequate to undertake the threat of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low elasticity of need is not a more suitable option specifically of it is affecting the sale of the business's revenue generating models.