Longtop Financial Technologies A Case Study Help Checklist

Longtop Financial Technologies A Case Study Help Checklist

Longtop Financial Technologies A Case Study Solution
Longtop Financial Technologies A Case Study Help
Longtop Financial Technologies A Case Study Analysis

Analyses for Evaluating Longtop Financial Technologies A decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Longtop Financial Technologies A where the business's consumers, rivals and core competencies have assessed in order to validate whether the choice to release Case Study Help under Longtop Financial Technologies A brand name would be a possible option or not. We have actually first of all taken a look at the type of clients that Longtop Financial Technologies A deals in while an assessment of the competitive environment and the company's weaknesses and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not launching Case Study Help under Longtop Financial Technologies A name.
Longtop Financial Technologies A Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Longtop Financial Technologies A clients can be segmented into 2 groups, commercial customers and last consumers. Both the groups utilize Longtop Financial Technologies A high performance adhesives while the business is not just involved in the production of these adhesives however likewise markets them to these customer groups. There are two kinds of products that are being offered to these potential markets; instantaneous adhesives and anaerobic adhesives. We would be concentrating on the consumers of immediate adhesives for this analysis because the marketplace for the latter has a lower capacity for Longtop Financial Technologies A compared to that of instant adhesives.

The total market for instant adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both client groups which have actually been identified earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Longtop Financial Technologies A potential market or customer groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Original Equipment Producers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair and upgrading business (MRO) and makers dealing in items made of leather, wood, metal and plastic. This diversity in consumers recommends that Longtop Financial Technologies A can target has numerous choices in terms of segmenting the market for its brand-new product specifically as each of these groups would be requiring the same type of product with respective modifications in packaging, need or quantity. Nevertheless, the customer is not rate delicate or brand conscious so releasing a low priced dispenser under Longtop Financial Technologies A name is not a suggested choice.

Company Analysis

Longtop Financial Technologies A is not simply a manufacturer of adhesives however enjoys market management in the instant adhesive industry. The company has its own experienced and qualified sales force which adds worth to sales by training the business's network of 250 suppliers for helping with the sale of adhesives. Longtop Financial Technologies A believes in special distribution as indicated by the truth that it has actually picked to sell through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be checked out for broadening reach through suppliers. The business's reach is not limited to The United States and Canada only as it also takes pleasure in worldwide sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all across North America, Longtop Financial Technologies A has its in-house production plants rather than utilizing out-sourcing as the favored technique.

Core proficiencies are not restricted to adhesive manufacturing only as Longtop Financial Technologies A likewise focuses on making adhesive giving equipment to facilitate the use of its items. This double production strategy gives Longtop Financial Technologies A an edge over rivals since none of the rivals of dispensing devices makes immediate adhesives. Additionally, none of these rivals offers directly to the consumer either and makes use of distributors for connecting to clients. While we are looking at the strengths of Longtop Financial Technologies A, it is essential to highlight the company's weaknesses.

Although the company's sales personnel is knowledgeable in training suppliers, the reality remains that the sales team is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive equipment. It needs to likewise be noted that the suppliers are showing hesitation when it comes to offering equipment that requires maintenance which increases the difficulties of offering devices under a specific brand name.

If we take a look at Longtop Financial Technologies A product line in adhesive devices particularly, the business has products aimed at the high end of the market. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Longtop Financial Technologies A sells Case Study Help under the very same portfolio. Provided the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Longtop Financial Technologies A high-end product line, sales cannibalization would certainly be affecting Longtop Financial Technologies A sales earnings if the adhesive equipment is sold under the business's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Longtop Financial Technologies A 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible danger which could lower Longtop Financial Technologies A income if Case Study Help is introduced under the business's trademark name. The fact that $175000 has been invested in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a good time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Additionally, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand orientation or price consciousness which offers us two extra reasons for not launching a low priced product under the company's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Longtop Financial Technologies A would be studied via Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth potential due to the existence of fragmented segments with Longtop Financial Technologies A taking pleasure in management and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry players, Eastman and Permabond. While market rivalry in between these players could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand name conscious and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the reality still remains that the industry is not filled and still has several market sectors which can be targeted as possible specific niche markets even when launching an adhesive. We can even point out the fact that sales cannibalization might be leading to industry rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for immediate adhesives uses development potential.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this industry is low particularly as the buyer has low understanding about the product. While companies like Longtop Financial Technologies A have handled to train suppliers concerning adhesives, the final customer depends on suppliers. Around 72% of sales are made straight by producers and distributors for instant adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Provided the reality that the adhesive market is dominated by 3 gamers, it could be said that the supplier delights in a greater bargaining power compared to the purchaser. Nevertheless, the truth remains that the supplier does not have much impact over the buyer at this moment particularly as the purchaser does not show brand name acknowledgment or price sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the buyer and the manufacturer do not have a significant control over the real sales, this indicates that the supplier has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name commitment and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese competitors in the instantaneous adhesive market indicates that the market enables ease of entry. If we look at Longtop Financial Technologies A in specific, the company has dual abilities in terms of being a maker of immediate adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Prospective hazards in devices giving market are low which shows the possibility of creating brand awareness in not only immediate adhesives however also in dispensing adhesives as none of the industry gamers has actually handled to position itself in double abilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The risk of replacements in the immediate adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic idea applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The reality stays that if Longtop Financial Technologies A presented Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for framework).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Longtop Financial Technologies A Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually offered various factors for not launching Case Study Help under Longtop Financial Technologies A name, we have a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help offered below if Longtop Financial Technologies A decides to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Automobile services' for a variety of reasons. There are presently 89257 establishments in this section and a high use of approximately 58900 pounds. is being utilized by 36.1 % of the marketplace. This market has an extra development capacity of 10.1% which might be a good enough niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser deal benefit to this specific market, the fact that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being cost use with SuperBonder. The item would be offered without the 'glumetic idea' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can choose whether he wishes to opt for either of the two devices or not.

Price: The suggested rate of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through distributors or through direct selling. This cost would not consist of the cost of the 'vari pointer' or the 'glumetic idea'. A rate listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at an automobile upkeep store needs to acquire the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to purchase the product for usage in their everyday maintenance jobs.

Longtop Financial Technologies A would just be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Longtop Financial Technologies A for releasing Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution model where Longtop Financial Technologies A straight sends the item to the local supplier and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the distributor would be used by Longtop Financial Technologies A. Because the sales team is already taken part in offering instant adhesives and they do not have competence in offering dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be expensive especially as each sales call expenses approximately $120. The suppliers are already selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial alternative.

Promotion: A low advertising spending plan should have been appointed to Case Study Help but the fact that the dispenser is an innovation and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the suggested advertising plan costing $51816 is suggested for at first presenting the product in the market. The planned ads in publications would be targeted at mechanics in automobile upkeep stores. (Suggested text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Longtop Financial Technologies A Case Study Analysis

A recommended plan of action in the kind of a marketing mix has been gone over for Case Study Help, the truth still stays that the item would not match Longtop Financial Technologies A product line. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross success for the two models is expected to be approximately $49377 if 250 units of each design are produced per year as per the plan. However, the initial prepared marketing is roughly $52000 per year which would be putting a strain on the business's resources leaving Longtop Financial Technologies A with a negative net income if the expenditures are designated to Case Study Help just.

The reality that Longtop Financial Technologies A has already sustained an initial financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and prototype development suggests that the income from Case Study Help is not enough to carry out the threat of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low flexibility of demand is not a more effective option specifically of it is impacting the sale of the company's revenue creating models.