WhatsApp

Longtop Financial Technologies A Case Study Help Checklist

Longtop Financial Technologies A Case Study Help Checklist

Longtop Financial Technologies A Case Study Solution
Longtop Financial Technologies A Case Study Help
Longtop Financial Technologies A Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Longtop Financial Technologies A decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Longtop Financial Technologies A where the business's customers, rivals and core competencies have actually assessed in order to validate whether the choice to release Case Study Help under Longtop Financial Technologies A brand name would be a feasible option or not. We have actually firstly taken a look at the kind of customers that Longtop Financial Technologies A handle while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the business's weaknesses and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not introducing Case Study Help under Longtop Financial Technologies A name.
Longtop Financial Technologies A Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Longtop Financial Technologies A consumers can be segmented into 2 groups, last consumers and industrial clients. Both the groups use Longtop Financial Technologies A high performance adhesives while the business is not just associated with the production of these adhesives but likewise markets them to these consumer groups. There are two types of products that are being offered to these prospective markets; anaerobic adhesives and instant adhesives. We would be focusing on the consumers of instant adhesives for this analysis considering that the marketplace for the latter has a lower capacity for Longtop Financial Technologies A compared to that of instant adhesives.

The overall market for immediate adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been recognized earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Longtop Financial Technologies A possible market or client groups, we can see that the business sells to OEMs (Initial Equipment Makers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair work and revamping companies (MRO) and makers dealing in items made of leather, metal, plastic and wood. This variety in clients recommends that Longtop Financial Technologies A can target has various alternatives in terms of segmenting the market for its new product especially as each of these groups would be needing the exact same type of product with respective modifications in product packaging, amount or need. However, the customer is not cost sensitive or brand name conscious so releasing a low priced dispenser under Longtop Financial Technologies A name is not an advised option.

Company Analysis

Longtop Financial Technologies A is not simply a producer of adhesives but delights in market management in the instantaneous adhesive market. The company has its own skilled and qualified sales force which adds value to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for assisting in the sale of adhesives. Longtop Financial Technologies A believes in unique distribution as shown by the fact that it has selected to offer through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be checked out for broadening reach through suppliers. The business's reach is not restricted to The United States and Canada only as it likewise enjoys global sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all throughout The United States and Canada, Longtop Financial Technologies A has its in-house production plants rather than using out-sourcing as the favored method.

Core skills are not restricted to adhesive production only as Longtop Financial Technologies A likewise focuses on making adhesive giving equipment to facilitate making use of its items. This dual production technique provides Longtop Financial Technologies A an edge over competitors since none of the competitors of dispensing devices makes immediate adhesives. In addition, none of these competitors sells straight to the customer either and utilizes suppliers for reaching out to consumers. While we are looking at the strengths of Longtop Financial Technologies A, it is necessary to highlight the business's weak points also.

The company's sales staff is competent in training suppliers, the reality stays that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. It ought to also be noted that the suppliers are revealing hesitation when it comes to selling equipment that requires maintenance which increases the challenges of offering equipment under a specific brand name.

The business has items aimed at the high end of the market if we look at Longtop Financial Technologies A product line in adhesive devices especially. If Longtop Financial Technologies A sells Case Study Help under the very same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Provided the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Longtop Financial Technologies A high-end product line, sales cannibalization would certainly be impacting Longtop Financial Technologies A sales income if the adhesive equipment is sold under the business's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Longtop Financial Technologies A 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible hazard which could lower Longtop Financial Technologies A profits if Case Study Help is launched under the company's trademark name. The truth that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a great time for introducing a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Additionally, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand orientation or cost consciousness which provides us two additional factors for not launching a low priced item under the company's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Longtop Financial Technologies A would be studied via Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development capacity due to the existence of fragmented segments with Longtop Financial Technologies A delighting in leadership and a combined market share of 75% with two other market gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While market rivalry between these gamers could be called 'intense' as the customer is not brand name mindful and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the reality still stays that the market is not saturated and still has a number of market segments which can be targeted as prospective specific niche markets even when launching an adhesive. However, we can even point out the truth that sales cannibalization might be resulting in industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives provides development potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this industry is low particularly as the purchaser has low knowledge about the product. While companies like Longtop Financial Technologies A have actually handled to train suppliers relating to adhesives, the last consumer depends on suppliers. Roughly 72% of sales are made straight by manufacturers and distributors for instantaneous adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the fact that the adhesive market is dominated by 3 gamers, it could be stated that the provider takes pleasure in a greater bargaining power compared to the purchaser. However, the truth remains that the supplier does not have much influence over the buyer at this point particularly as the buyer does disappoint brand recognition or price sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the purchaser and the manufacturer do not have a major control over the actual sales, this shows that the supplier has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the instant adhesive market shows that the market allows ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we look at Longtop Financial Technologies A in particular, the business has dual abilities in terms of being a producer of instantaneous adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Possible risks in devices giving industry are low which shows the possibility of creating brand name awareness in not just immediate adhesives but also in giving adhesives as none of the industry players has managed to position itself in dual abilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The danger of replacements in the instant adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic suggestion applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The fact stays that if Longtop Financial Technologies A introduced Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Longtop Financial Technologies A Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually given different factors for not launching Case Study Help under Longtop Financial Technologies A name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help given listed below if Longtop Financial Technologies A decides to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target audience picked for Case Study Help is 'Automobile services' for a number of reasons. There are currently 89257 establishments in this section and a high use of around 58900 lbs. is being utilized by 36.1 % of the marketplace. This market has an additional development capacity of 10.1% which may be a sufficient specific niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this particular market, the fact that the Do-it-Yourself market can likewise be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder. The item would be sold without the 'glumetic pointer' and 'vari-drop' so that the customer can choose whether he wishes to choose either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The recommended cost of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through distributors or by means of direct selling. This rate would not consist of the expense of the 'vari idea' or the 'glumetic suggestion'. A rate below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at an automobile maintenance shop needs to acquire the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to buy the product for use in their everyday upkeep tasks.

Longtop Financial Technologies A would only be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross profitability and net success for Longtop Financial Technologies A for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation design where Longtop Financial Technologies A straight sends the product to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be used by Longtop Financial Technologies A. Because the sales team is currently engaged in selling immediate adhesives and they do not have knowledge in selling dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be costly especially as each sales call expenses roughly $120. The distributors are already offering dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial choice.

Promotion: Although a low promotional budget ought to have been assigned to Case Study Help however the truth that the dispenser is a development and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the recommended advertising strategy costing $51816 is advised for at first presenting the product in the market. The prepared advertisements in publications would be targeted at mechanics in car maintenance stores. (Recommended text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Longtop Financial Technologies A Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has been talked about for Case Study Help, the truth still stays that the product would not complement Longtop Financial Technologies A product line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross profitability for the two models is expected to be around $49377 if 250 units of each design are produced annually according to the strategy. However, the initial prepared marketing is around $52000 annually which would be putting a stress on the business's resources leaving Longtop Financial Technologies A with a negative earnings if the costs are allocated to Case Study Help just.

The fact that Longtop Financial Technologies A has actually currently sustained a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and prototype development suggests that the earnings from Case Study Help is inadequate to carry out the risk of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low elasticity of demand is not a preferable option specifically of it is affecting the sale of the business's income producing designs.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE