Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy Case Study Help Checklist

Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy Case Study Help Checklist

Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy Case Study Solution
Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy Case Study Help
Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy Case Study Analysis

Analyses for Evaluating Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy where the business's consumers, rivals and core proficiencies have actually evaluated in order to validate whether the choice to release Case Study Help under Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy brand would be a feasible option or not. We have actually to start with taken a look at the kind of consumers that Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy deals in while an examination of the competitive environment and the business's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not introducing Case Study Help under Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy name.
Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups utilize Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy high performance adhesives while the company is not just included in the production of these adhesives but likewise markets them to these consumer groups. We would be focusing on the consumers of instant adhesives for this analysis since the market for the latter has a lower potential for Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The overall market for instantaneous adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been determined earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy possible market or consumer groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Initial Equipment Producers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair and overhauling companies (MRO) and manufacturers dealing in products made from leather, wood, plastic and metal. This variety in customers recommends that Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy can target has numerous options in terms of segmenting the marketplace for its brand-new product especially as each of these groups would be requiring the same type of product with respective modifications in demand, amount or product packaging. The customer is not rate sensitive or brand conscious so introducing a low priced dispenser under Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy name is not a suggested choice.

Company Analysis

Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy is not just a manufacturer of adhesives however enjoys market management in the immediate adhesive market. The business has its own experienced and certified sales force which includes value to sales by training the business's network of 250 suppliers for helping with the sale of adhesives.

Core skills are not limited to adhesive production only as Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy also focuses on making adhesive dispensing devices to help with using its products. This dual production strategy offers Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy an edge over rivals because none of the rivals of giving equipment makes immediate adhesives. In addition, none of these competitors offers directly to the consumer either and makes use of suppliers for reaching out to clients. While we are looking at the strengths of Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy, it is important to highlight the business's weak points.

Although the company's sales personnel is experienced in training suppliers, the truth remains that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying greatly on suppliers when promoting adhesive equipment. However, it should also be kept in mind that the distributors are showing reluctance when it pertains to offering equipment that needs maintenance which increases the challenges of selling devices under a particular brand name.

If we take a look at Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy line of product in adhesive devices especially, the business has actually products focused on the luxury of the marketplace. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy sells Case Study Help under the same portfolio. Provided the fact that Case Study Help is priced lower than Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy high-end product line, sales cannibalization would definitely be affecting Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy sales revenue if the adhesive devices is offered under the company's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is introduced under the business's brand name, there is another possible risk which could decrease Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy revenue. The reality that $175000 has actually been invested in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

In addition, if we take a look at the market in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or rate awareness which provides us two additional reasons for not introducing a low priced product under the business's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy would be studied via Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth capacity due to the presence of fragmented segments with Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy delighting in leadership and a combined market share of 75% with two other market players, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition in between these players could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand mindful and each of these gamers has prominence in terms of market share, the truth still stays that the market is not saturated and still has a number of market sections which can be targeted as possible niche markets even when launching an adhesive. However, we can even mention the reality that sales cannibalization may be leading to industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the marketplace for instantaneous adhesives provides growth potential.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this industry is low especially as the purchaser has low knowledge about the product. While companies like Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy have handled to train suppliers relating to adhesives, the last customer depends on distributors. Around 72% of sales are made directly by producers and distributors for instant adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the truth that the adhesive market is dominated by 3 gamers, it could be said that the supplier takes pleasure in a higher bargaining power compared to the buyer. The reality stays that the provider does not have much influence over the purchaser at this point specifically as the purchaser does not show brand name acknowledgment or cost sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the manufacturer and the purchaser do not have a significant control over the real sales, this shows that the distributor has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese rivals in the instantaneous adhesive market suggests that the marketplace enables ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we look at Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy in particular, the company has double capabilities in regards to being a maker of adhesive dispensers and instant adhesives. Possible threats in equipment dispensing industry are low which reveals the possibility of creating brand name awareness in not only immediate adhesives but also in giving adhesives as none of the industry gamers has actually handled to place itself in dual capabilities.

Risk of Substitutes: The hazard of replacements in the immediate adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has substitutes like Glumetic idea applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The truth remains that if Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy presented Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for structure).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has offered numerous factors for not releasing Case Study Help under Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy name, we have actually a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help given listed below if Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy decides to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target audience chosen for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of factors. There are currently 89257 establishments in this segment and a high usage of approximately 58900 pounds. is being utilized by 36.1 % of the marketplace. This market has an extra growth capacity of 10.1% which may be a good enough specific niche market section for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this specific market, the fact that the Diy market can also be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder. The product would be sold without the 'glumetic tip' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can decide whether he wishes to select either of the two devices or not.

Price: The recommended rate of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through distributors or by means of direct selling. This rate would not include the cost of the 'vari idea' or the 'glumetic tip'. A price listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance shop requires to purchase the item on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to purchase the product for use in their day-to-day upkeep jobs.

Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy would just be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross profitability and net success for Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy straight sends out the item to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the distributor would be utilized by Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy. Since the sales team is currently taken part in selling immediate adhesives and they do not have expertise in offering dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be costly particularly as each sales call expenses approximately $120. The distributors are currently offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial alternative.

Promotion: Although a low promotional budget plan must have been designated to Case Study Help but the truth that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the suggested advertising plan costing $51816 is suggested for at first presenting the item in the market. The prepared ads in publications would be targeted at mechanics in automobile maintenance stores. (Recommended text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has actually been gone over for Case Study Help, the truth still stays that the product would not complement Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy product line. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two models is expected to be approximately $49377 if 250 systems of each model are produced annually based on the plan. The initial prepared marketing is roughly $52000 per year which would be putting a strain on the company's resources leaving Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy with an unfavorable net earnings if the costs are assigned to Case Study Help just.

The fact that Progressive Insurance Disclosure Strategy has actually currently sustained an initial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development suggests that the profits from Case Study Help is not enough to undertake the threat of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low elasticity of demand is not a more effective alternative specifically of it is affecting the sale of the company's profits generating designs.